Why Israelis Are Taking to the Streets
The furious response to a seemingly modest reform reflects a broader dispute about the role of courts in a democracy.
The furious response to a seemingly modest reform reflects a broader dispute about the role of courts in a democracy.
Harvard law Prof. Mark Tushnet and political scientist Aaron Belkin urge President Biden to disobey "gravely mistaken" Supreme Court rulings. Doing so would set a dangerous precedent likely to be abused by the right, as well as the left.
The appeals court judge argued that the Israeli Supreme Court had usurped the role of legislators.
Chief Justice John Roberts decisively rejected the independent state legislature theory.
Plus: A listener question considers the pros and cons of the libertarian focus on political processes rather than political results.
Plus: Librarians take on Arkansas book restrictions, another migrant stunt may have originated in Florida, and more...
The article explains why libertarians should focus much more on constitutional issues arising from zoning, immigration restrictions and racial profiling.
A response to Professors Goldsmith & Volokh
Plus: DeSantis does better than Trump in swing-state poll, majority say abortion pill should remain available, and more...
Opponents of the proposed reforms are right that unlimited majority rule is a recipe for tyranny.
The Constitution was intended to preserve state sovereignty, not create an all-powerful central government.
It argues for increasing the number of cases in the Supreme Court's "Hall of Shame" and proposes three worthy additions.
Douglass is best-known for his role in the abolitionist movement that helped end slavery. But much of his thought is also relevant to contemporary issues.
The Commission's lone dissenter says Congress has not charged it with regulating noncompete clauses.
reviewing Common Good Constitutionalism.
Originalist scholar Larry Solum suggests KBJ could be the Left's Antonin Scalia.
Plus: The editors consider a listener question on the involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.
Plus: Court rejects Biden plea on student loan plan, Ohio cops don't understand the First Amendment, and more...
Civil liberties groups say Adams' plan violates constitutional rights protecting people with mental illness from being confined against their will simply for existing.
The proposed constitutional amendment would shift the state's balance of political power.
In the two cases, brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions argues that race-conscious admissions violate the Civil Rights Act
The case is now on appeal after a lower court said the ban on websites promoting prostitution didn't concern protected speech.
One Ilya reviews a book written by another. Hopefully, this won't exacerbate #IlyaConfusion!