Supreme Court Sides With Jack Daniel's Against Doggy Chew Toy Company
It's not a broad attack on free expression, but Thursday's ruling is certainly a victory for brands that can't take a joke.
It's not a broad attack on free expression, but Thursday's ruling is certainly a victory for brands that can't take a joke.
The case could have long-term implications for how broadly fair use can be applied.
Meanwhile, content creators and corporations want copyright regulations for artificial intelligence.
Plus: "Sensitivity readers" rewrite Agatha Christie, a Little Free Library battle, and more...
Copyright law is just one area that must adapt to account for revolutionary A.I. technology.
The U.S. Copyright Office determined that images produced by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted, even though they are generated by user-written prompts.
Law from the dawn of the dawn of the AI age.
Plus: the editors field a listener question on intellectual property.
The indie artists suing Stable Diffusion may not realize it, but they're doing the Mouse's dirty work.
For 20 years, D&D has offered third-party publishers an open, royalty-free license to create new works using its game. A leaked revision would end all of that.
Nearly a century after author Arthur Conan Doyle's death, the character is finally free.
The company alleges the composers ignored multiple warnings to cease commercial production of the musical.
As pop culture icons enter the public domain, a strange new era of copyright begins.
said Judge Vince Chhabria (N.D. Cal.) about this amicus brief from Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen).and Phillip R. Malone of the Juelsgaard I/P and Innovation Clinic (at Stanford).
Despite the senator's clear culture war animus, there are things to like about his bill.
Plus: A short debate on intellectual property
A Santa Ana police officer is the latest official to use YouTube's copyright infringement algorithm as a means to evade accountability.
By blaming their reasoning on culture war grievances rather than the best interests of the law, the GOP risks undermining a completely defensible position.
And has to pay $10K in attorney fees to the high school as well.
The latest from Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen), pushing back against threats of trademark litigation over parody.
Patent lawyer Stephan Kinsella debates Law Professor Richard Epstein
Patent lawyer Stephan Kinsella debates law professor Richard Epstein
"Categories, microworks, and market circularity."
An interesting controversy involving Portland State University.
Likely fair use, at least under the Second Circuit's precedents.
As with all fair use claims, the analysis turns on the particular facts.
So holds Judge Virginia A. Phillips (C.D. Cal.) in Tracy Chapman's lawsuit against Nicki Minaj.
"[T]he Court has little difficulty concluding that Hughes's dual goals in bringing her baseless suit were to inflict financial harm on Benjamin and to raise her own profile in the process."
"The Movants are undoubtedly correct in asserting that 'nationwide sanctions' are rare, but that is only because they are rarely warranted."
"One of the most frequently sanctioned lawyers, if not the most frequently sanctioned lawyer," in the Southern District of New York.
A long-running legal battle ends with a victory for open government.
They trade tips and manuals through a decentralized information-sharing network. Biomedical technicians say it's the fastest and easiest way to get life-saving information.
Four Second Circuit judges gave fair use victories (separately) to rapper Drake and blogger Sargon of Akkad, concluding that defendants' uses of plaintiffs' work to comment on it and criticize it were fair use and thus not copyright infringement.
The Supreme Court now has before it a case in which some very important copyright principles are at stake.