FBI Made 'Inappropriate Use' of Foreign Surveillance Program To Spy on Americans
A White House panel says the FBI's internal control over Section 702 databases are "insufficient to ensure compliance and earn the public's trust."
A White House panel says the FBI's internal control over Section 702 databases are "insufficient to ensure compliance and earn the public's trust."
As states continue to implement digital ID systems, it is essential that they build tools in ways that inherently protect civil liberties rather than asking citizens to just trust government officials.
The reauthorization of Section 702 is one of the most important issues facing Congress in the second half of this year.
Abortion and privacy activists join over concerns that cell phones track our movements.
Plus: Montanans challenge ban on drag story hour, Arizona approves birth control without a prescription, and more...
Prominent reporters and powerful officials know each other, share attitudes, and trust each other.
Plus: Court using anti-pornography software to track a criminal defendant, $25 million verdict against Starbucks over fired employee, and more...
Eight weeks ago, a camouflaged game warden came onto Josh Highlander's land, scared his son, and stole his trail camera.
Children raised in an atmosphere of fear become adults who prioritize security over liberty.
The lawsuit looks iffy in light of the Supreme Court's "open fields" doctrine.
The state court of appeals held previously that unconstitutionally collected evidence could still be used for civil enforcement.
The record penalty seems to be based less on the Facebook parent company's lax data practices than the U.S. intelligence community's data-collection programs.
Despite some headway in protecting privacy, the surveillance state hasn’t gone away.
The FBI's sloppy, secret search warrants should be a concern for all Americans.
From Russiagate to COVID discourse, elites in government and the media are trying to control and centralize free speech and open inquiry.
Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion of Jacob Siegel's broadside against the "counter-disinformation complex" in Tablet magazine.
An expanded surveillance state can’t solve problems created by drug prohibition.
The feds invoke national security to take away more of your rights and pretend they're keeping you safe.
Never underestimate officials’ ability to turn embarrassing moments into awful opportunities.
'Digidog is out of the pound," New York City Mayor Eric Adams declared, not ominously.
The Bottoms Up and the Devil Laughs author and former Reason staffer reports back from post-privacy America.
Plus: the terrible case for pausing A.I. innovation
Is an A.I. "foom" even possible?
Plus: Senate Republicans spar over TikTok and free speech, Americans can't agree on how to cut spending, and more...
Plus: States consider mandatory anti-porn filters, tariffs create baby formula shortages (again), and more...
As the government sets its sights on migrants crossing the border, native-born Americans have also come under its watchful eye.
Our mobile devices constantly snitch on our whereabouts.
Plus: More lawmakers move to decriminalize psychedelic plants, Tennessee's "adult cabaret" law, and more...
Politicians lean on the financial industry to target activities they don’t like.
Officials shield government abuses from litigation by claiming “national security.” The Supreme Court declined to weigh in.
The government is refining its ability to track your movements with little discussion.
Plus: States move to curtail internet anonymity, Amsterdam cracks down on cannabis, sex, and booze, and more...
These days, he may run for president. His politics have changed.
Plus: The French face "le wokisme," a Tennessee "eyelash specialist license" would require 300 hours education, and more...
They both share in their authoritarian desires to censor online speech and violate citizen privacy.
Thousands of local, state, and federal law-enforcers have access to sensitive financial data.
Eliminating privacy in schools would be a disaster for academic freedom and social development.
An op-ed in The New York Times tries to make the case that the Chinese Communist Party is a worthy partner in raising children.
Part of a law that authorizes warrantless snooping is about to expire, opening up a opportunity to better protect our privacy rights.
Intelligence-gathering “fusion centers” repeatedly abuse civil liberties without making us safer.
Plus: Still no House speaker, the gender gap in college scholarships, Meta fined $414 million, and more...
The first FBI director wasn't all bad (or a cross-dresser). But he and the agency he created regularly flouted constitutional limits on power.
The first FBI director wasn't a cross-dresser, says a new biography, but he was often quick to flout constitutional limits on state power.
A surveillance state is no less tyrannical when the snoops really believe it's for your own protection.